DaVinci code essays

DaVinci code essays Discuss the main characters/ relationships between characters/ internal and external conflicts. Use the characters names. Robert Langdon is a man suspected of the murder of the curator of the Louvre. He is convinced to run my Sophie Neveu, the curators granddaughter, to run. They encounter a series of external conflicts like Silas, the killer albino monk, Fache, Coller, the local polices, and the codes they have to solve. Some internal conflicts were that Sophie kept thinking about her grandfather and both had were frustrated with the ciphers. Langdons major internal conflict was the decision to run and not defend himself in court or against Fache. Plot Summary In a two days, the American symbologist Robert Langdon finds himself accused of murdering the curator of the Louvre. While on the run through the streets of Paris and London, he teams up with French cryptologist, Sophie Neveu, to uncover the secret location of the Holy Grail. Also, a conservative Catholic bishop is on the edge of destroying the Grail, which includes a secret history of Christ that could bring down the entire church. Whoever is ordering the deaths of the Grail's guardians, most likely modern-day members of an ancient society started by the famed Knights Templar must be stopped before the treasure is lost forever. In order to do so, Langdon and Neveu have to solve a series of ciphers, riddles, and codes while also evading the French police commander, Fache and a murderous albino monk named Silas. Right now, (halfway) they are stuck solving ingenious riddles and codes each leading to another set of codes and ciphers, over and over again. What will happen next? Read the next reading log by me, Dennis Chen. 3 Examples of Foreshadowing 1. When I read the part where Dan Brown describes the crime scene, in my head I knew it was just like the Vitruvian ...

How Dare a Writing Contest Take Your Rights

How Dare a Writing Contest Take Your Rights After posting the Story Shares writing contest in the newsletter a couple weeks ago, people wrote me, asking what I thought about the fact those who enter give up payment and rights You have read the terms correctly; we are asking writers who enter the contest to give us the rights to publish their stories widely and for free. This arrangement allows us to fulfill one of our core missions for Story Shares, which is to increase the library of materials available to teens and young adults who struggle with reading. If we only displayed the 5 winning stories, the library would not be nearly as big as it will be under the current terms for the contest. Since this is a nonprofit initiative, we are not seeking any financial benefit from publishing the stories. We are simply trying to do as much as possible to fill the need for more high-quality reading materials available to the millions of struggling teen and adult readers who need them. In order to do that, we need to retain the rights to publish stories for free. We understand that these might not be ideal conditions for you to publish and will be sorry to miss out on your story. Folks . . . being a nonprofit does not negate the need to pay your suppliers. They will pay the publisher. I guarantee that they pay the website designer and hosting service for the Story Shares site. They have access to grants and sponsors to fund these writers and all else they do, especially riding on the wave of education. Instead of trying to find the funds to pay the writers, they instead  take the work for free. And trust me . . . their promotion of you is not going to open many doors. In a subsequent email, they went on to say they endorse writers and promote them, though they are not paid. They claim to have great relationships with all their writers, saying, in essence, the organization isnt malicious or gold-digging. However, they are using the contest to populate their program. I get irritated with some literary journals that do the same thing, but at least those markets are selective and state that some non-winning stories may be considered for publication. Here, however, Story Shares states you give up rights upon submission. They are giving $5,000 in prize money. Why not use that money to pay smaller amounts to all writers who submit, calling it a Call for Submissions? I can tell you why. The substantial prize money is bait to gather more submissions that they can use for free. Sorry, but I dont think the Outreach Coordinator (who has published through Story Shares) who wrote me or the founders and CEO of the program are working for free. If they choose to do so, good for them; however, I take issue with the fact they think others should do the same. But somehowI sense they are getting paid. If you feel this is a good charitable cause, and wish to donate your work, feel free. But FundsforWriters was founded upon writers earning a living from their work, and therefore,  FundsforWriters does not endorse storyshares.org/ and apologizes for having listed it in a previous newsletter.